“Team leadership has replaced middle management and our companies are becoming ‘networks of teams,’ ” according to a recent 2016 research report published by Josh Bersin.1
Teams are working harder to discover and provide innovative solutions. A team’s capability to communicate and elevate performance can directly address engagement and impact the bottom line.
The evolution of leadership and point of impact in organizational development is now directed towards the value of teams. As stated in the Bersin report:
“Now, an even newer type of management thinking has emerged. Companies should be driven by mission and purpose, with flexible, dynamic teams and managers as “team leaders” not as “executives.” These companies do away with the idea that you are a leader because of your position – and focus on people developing “followership,” and building the systems and tools which let people cross communicate easily and organize around a “network of teams” as the new model.”
Given the rapid pace of change, boosting the leader’s effectiveness and creating high performing teams is paramount for cutting through chaos. The old paradigm where teams took time to become cohesive is not an option in a business climate where teams are assembled quickly and asked to deliver immediate results.
Team coaching is a valuable tool for addressing this challenge. Professional coaches or internal HROD professionals can teach coaching skills as they guide teams through a business-focused process that impacts team dynamics and the bottom line. And team leaders who learn coaching skills while being coached through a team coaching program apply those skills in real time developmental conversations.
Ideal applications for team coaching include:
Studies have demonstrated that team coaching delivers a positive return-on-investment and many organizations have developed coaching capabilities where team coaching can be an augmentation to their current coaching activities.
What is distinct about team coaching from other methods of working with teams? This table highlights the differences between team coaching and other common approaches:
Team Facilitation | Team Building | Training | Team Process | Team Coaching |
Focus is on… | ||||
Open dialogue, to generate a number of outcomes, making it easier for team to establish agreements | Cooperation, fun, short term event to make people feel better about the team and move toward consensus | Educational transfer of specific skills and knowledge, typically in a teaching model | Movement of the team through a specific construct or organizational stages model, requiring observation and discussion about the process | Experience of learning in action, process of discovery, engagement in co-creation, taking more conscious action through a deeper inquiry, personal awareness, discovery, and partnership |
Professional’s role | ||||
Context and guidance | Guide, cheer lead, encourage | Teach Theory,
Transfer skills Practice |
Share observations, hold the process in place | Coach, listen, elicit creativity, create and hold agreements and process celebrate movement, build awareness and leadership from real time team dynamics, development for each team member |
Agenda | ||||
Leader sets the agenda, team contributes | Team leader sets the agenda, team participates | Trainer sets the agenda | Professional sets the agenda, teaches team | Entire team creates the agenda together with guidance of the team leader and coach |
As shown in the table, team coaching is a much more collaborative approach that fully involves the team and team leader and focuses on building sustainable action and change.
What makes team coaching so powerful?
The collaborative nature of team coaching makes it a very powerful tool. Here are some key characteristics of team coaching:
What does team coaching require?
There are three critical ingredients for a successful team coaching engagement. These are:
What does the data suggest?
There have been two research studies conducted on team coaching. 2,3 In both studies, survey questionnaires were used before and after the team coaching process to assess the impact. Questions were targeted at measuring employee engagement and key leadership behaviors.
One study looked at results from 24 teams who took part in a team coaching intervention. The results showed statistically significant increases in engagement and in seven of twelve leadership behaviors measured (all showed positive change). A third survey was conducted three months after team coaching ended to see if the positive changes remained. For all twelve behaviors and the engagement index, the positive gains remained stable.
A second study looked at the results from 60 teams. In this study, engagement scores moved from 61.6% positive to 90.4% positive in one year, an increase of nearly 30 percentage points. Leadership behaviors also showed a positive gain with five of the six behaviors measured showing statistically significant gains.
In summary, team coaching is the bold, experiential approach that is proven to advance teams to play a bigger game. It engages teams at higher and more intimate levels than more traditional team development processes.
3 White Paper. Change Agents, Team Coaching & Organizational Transformation – Sanofi Changes its Culture and the Game of Work! DJ Mitsch and Barry F. Mitsch, The Pyramid Resource Group and Lynn Hays, Haysmar Inc. 2014.
Click here to learn more or to be certified to coach teams.
Barry MitschBarry Mitsch is co-founder of the Pyramid Resource Group. His background includes work in both technical and non-technical training, and he has designed and delivered classroom, self-instructional and distance-learning programs. Barry is a community activist, adventurer and student of life. |
|
||
|
November 9, 2016
Check out this new Zombies to Zealots video by Balboa
August 24, 2016
Competition: Human Fuel for High Performance
August 23, 2016
North Carolina Office:
Address: 108 Canberra Court, Cary, NC 27513
Phone: 919-677-9300
Email: info@www.team-advantage.com
2023 Team Advantage & All rights reserved. Home Page | Privacy Policy | Terms of use |